The Gap Between Knowing and Doing
Here's something we noticed early on: people grasped concepts
quickly but hesitated when it came to implementation.
Understanding how portfolio automation works is different from
trusting it with your actual money.
So we started using smaller amounts for initial setups. Test
with €500, not €50,000. Watch how the system behaves over a few
weeks. Get comfortable with the mechanics before scaling up.
Turns out confidence comes from observation, not explanation.
The breakthrough moment isn't when someone understands
automation—it's when they stop checking it every morning.
We also learned that mistakes during training were valuable.
When someone's test automation triggered incorrectly, the whole
group learned from debugging it. Those sessions generated more
questions than any lecture ever did.
Why We Don't Rush the Fundamentals
There's pressure to get to the exciting automation bits
quickly. But skip the groundwork and people build systems they
don't fully understand. That creates problems later when
markets behave unexpectedly.
Our autumn 2025 programme dedicates the first three weeks to
manual processes. Calculate rebalancing by hand. Track
portfolio drift on a spreadsheet. Understand the logic before
automating it. It feels slow, but participants who complete
these modules troubleshoot their own systems more effectively.
The other benefit? People discover which parts of investing
they actually want to automate and which they prefer handling
manually. Not everything needs automation, and that's a valid
conclusion to reach.